tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16646992.post4049807659605385132..comments2023-10-14T23:56:22.016-10:00Comments on Reflecting Light: Pretzel syntaxRick Darbyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02371910140619422820noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16646992.post-24295161718452370452012-06-02T07:50:21.057-10:002012-06-02T07:50:21.057-10:00YIH,
Did you ask LA to use your screen name and h...YIH,<br /><br />Did you ask LA to use your screen name and he published your real name anyway? I'll give you space here to describe what happened if you want, but it's only fair to offer him the chance for rebuttal.<br /><br />Rick Darby is my real name. There have been times when I wished I had chosen a pseudonym when I started the blog. But while I write things that can offend some people, I don't believe I've ever strayed beyond reasonable discourse and what <i>should</i> be protected under the First Amendment. I don't advocate anything illegal and I'm on record as against violence in our anti-Leftist cause. <br /><br />If we reach a point in this country where what I say here provokes retribution by the state, then this blog will be the least of my worries.Rick Darbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02371910140619422820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16646992.post-62557083350122536072012-06-01T18:54:35.035-10:002012-06-01T18:54:35.035-10:00Mr. Darby, this is a rant but I have to get it off...Mr. Darby, this is a rant but I have to get it off my chest. You might be thinking ''why did he bring this here and not to Auster?''<br />I'll tell you, I use a pseudonym, and he 'broke' it.<br />That's unforgivable, period. He doesn't get a second chance.<br />I realize it matters not to you, that's your actual name (as far as I know) but it matters to me.<br />If he (and you) can survive and make a living using your real name GREAT!!!<br />I envy you, that you can you can post using what is apparently your real name,<br />But at least you can call yourself ''Reflecting Light'' or ''RL'' if it becomes necessary.<br />You at least have the option.YIHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16646992.post-2208263134509157382012-06-01T05:39:25.301-10:002012-06-01T05:39:25.301-10:00I too noted the ''breedist'' threa...I too noted the ''breedist'' thread over at <a href="http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/022516.html" rel="nofollow">Auster</a>. Frankly I've read pretty much the same as Jeanette V. several times before (and it always seems to be from a female writer) this idea that Whites can and should ''outbreed'' non-Whites. That she went to the ''doomsayer nonsense'' argument was also predictable. Recently, I came across an entry on Wikipedia that fascinated me, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Calhoun#1963-1983" rel="nofollow">it was an experiment involving mice</a>. Mickey and pals had it great, the only thing that wasn't unlimited was space. Towards the end of the experiment the behavior of the mice changed radically, they quit reproducing.<br />After reading that I thought <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-16500768" rel="nofollow">''that's pretty much Japan today!''</a> Urban Japan is much more crowded than even New York City. Complete with the same effects as those mice. Young male Japanese who are so obsessed with entertainment who have no interest in sex (they refer to it as ''otaku culture'').<br />That's why I consider the ''technology and better means of food production will compensate!'' idea misguided.<br />Sure, <i>natural</i> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrying_capacity" rel="nofollow">''carrying capacity''</a> for cattle can be exceeded with ''feedlots'' but the side effects are already becoming obvious (antibiotic feed).<br />And what happens when energy stops being relatively cheap and plentiful? That word ''unsustainable'' rears it's ugly head again.<br />Soylent Green anyone?YIHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16646992.post-55196390196078508992012-05-31T04:03:46.732-10:002012-05-31T04:03:46.732-10:00Ghost of VW,
You've made the case so well I h...Ghost of VW,<br /><br />You've made the case so well I have nothing to add.<br /><br />Breedists are either dead stupid or, like Lawrence Auster's correspondent, want their group to breed for political advantage.Rick Darbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02371910140619422820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16646992.post-32581879230912216222012-05-30T19:23:13.756-10:002012-05-30T19:23:13.756-10:00This is OT, Rick, but I was wondering if you could...This is OT, Rick, but I was wondering if you could help me understand <a href="http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/022516.html" rel="nofollow">breedists</a>. <br /><br />There are 7 billion people in the world. What would life be like if there were only 6 billion? Would it be an unlivable hell? <br /><br />What number will make the breedists happy? 10 billion? 15 billion? Why not 50 billion?<br /><br />I've also noticed that breedists get very vague when it comes to the nuts and bolts of their argument. They seem to want some sort of breeding competition with brown people, but they never specify the victory conditions (perhaps a country of 500 million with 10% more Caucasians than there are now?). They also assume that their competitors will remain nonviolent for the duration, and they're not even doing that now. And we haven't yet addressed the fact that whites are essentially <i>paying</i> their competitors to outbreed them, or that most of the breeding nowadays results in more 3rd worlders, who, far from magically generating prosperity due to increased numbers, look to us for food, medicine, and ultimately sanctuary.<br /><br />Anyway, I just needed to get that off my chest. Humans have nothing to gain by living like sardines in a can.Ghost of VWnoreply@blogger.com