Thursday, September 13, 2012

Today's Islamophobic news story

The Washington Times has picked up a story from a Lebanese news agency:
According to the Lebanese news organization Tayyar.org, citing AFP [Agence France Presse?] news sources, U.S. ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, who was killed by gunmen that stormed the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on Tuesday, was reportedly raped before being murdered. 
Also,
A news report made by the Libyan Free Press is also reporting that Ambassador Stevens was sodomized before he was killed: "Libya - USA Ambassador in Bengazi sodomized and killed by his own al-Qaeda puppets."
Very likely these Libyan sources are the Middle Eastern equivalent of the National Enquirer -- although it's surprising if the original story actually was from Agence France Presse, the French equivalent of AP or Reuters.

I suppose getting murdered is inconvenient enough that being buggered doesn't really change the score that much for the victim. Regardless, the attacks on American diplomatic compounds are barbaric. Since the Middle Ages, it's been axiomatic that diplomatic personnel are guaranteed safe conduct. In World War II, diplomats of the Allies and the Axis were interned by their respective enemies -- put under house arrest, more or less. All through the Cold War, we had an embassy in Moscow and the worst the Soviets did was hide microphones and try to catch Americans with access to secrets in honey traps.

But the United States, and the whole anemic Western world, can't fathom that they are dealing with a politico-religious system that knows no rules of fair play, for whom infidels are simply dogs. The dogs have had their day. Now it's payback time.

Our politicians, even supposed experts on Islam and Middle Eastern ways, seem to have an impermeable filter in their brains that blocks the discomfiting reality. No matter what, they're ready to try one more time to show the world's Muslims that we're really nice people when they get to know us, that we'll overlook a few extremists, keep the aid money flowing through the pipeline, welcome more Muslim immigrants. There's no problem with Islam, just "violence" -- a disembodied kind, unconnected with Islam itself, that attacks like the flu.

And maybe that isn't a bad metaphor. The blogosphere has lots of talk at the moment about retaliation, teaching lessons &c. But we don't have to send drones over Libya or lob missiles into camel-parking lots; we need to quarantine Islam. No Muslim immigrants; no visas for Muslim visitors. I don't care if they just want to see the Grand Canyon. Let them get the message that their co-religionists have made them pariahs in the civilized world.

Does that sound extreme? Not half as extreme as what befell Christopher Stevens. If we don't practice separation from Islam, there will be more such atrocities, and more, until finally we run out of goodwill and the lid blows off. Then you'll see extreme.

The solution isn't "Islamophobia," whatever that means to you. It's containment. Close our embassies and consulates in Muslim-majority countries. Let the Shiites and Sunnis pronounce curses on each other and wring one another's necks. Let sad sack mullahs impose their medieval laws until Iran's next revolution. Unfortunate, but not our problem. And let's see that the fanatics understand that if they insist on their caliphate becoming our business, they won't like the way we do business.


Secretary of Appeasement Clinton reaches out to the Religion of Peace.

"But, we oh what good people we are, we will apologize for having an embassy and for having free speech and for getting our embassy in the way of their mob and our free speech in the way of our religious sensibilities. And we will see about getting all of the above out of their way. After Muslims killed thousands of Americans we did everything we could to learn about their religion, to celebrate it and soothe their ruffled feathers. Like an anxious host, we are still rushing around to see that our Muslim guest has enough coffee and egg rolls while promising to do something about that free speech that offends him."


6 comments:

DiverCity said...

Separationism! Hear, hear! Great post.

YIH said...

Separationism? Agreed.
On this past 9/11 when I could stand to even listen to talk radio I kept hearing the phrase ''radical islam'' as if it's something different from ''islam''.
The problem is, it's not. I'm quite aware of that fact as are you.
Before 9/11 I thought of islam ''as just another religion'', something I can support or not.
You think reincarnation happens, I seriously doubt it but ''we can agree to disagree'' on the subject.
No harm no foul.
After 9/11 I realized that islam is something different, in the past we fought our enemies by the ''Marquess of Queensberry Rules'', fight hard, fight fair.
We don't live in that world anymore, we now live in an ''Ultimate Fighting'' world now. In fact worse, there is no ''fighting rules'', as some of us have figured out now.
The tragic part is there are many who actually believe ''islam is a religion of peace'' and say we must fight ''radical islam'' so ''the real islam'' can present itself.
No, that will not work anymore, there are some who suggest we ''pull out all the stops'' in regards this war against islam but if ''we need to break the glass'' and ''hit the red button'' we should no longer hesitate to do so.

Rick Darby said...

I don't believe Islam and the rest of the world can mix without endless conflict. That doesn't mean we have to destroy Muslims' belief in their system's supremacy, which would involve something like what we did to Japan in 1945 in all its horror. But we have to stop playing the sucker and wearing a sign that says "Kick me."

Separation is the only way I can see to do that. Muslim values are simply too incompatible with ours to keep pretending they are "just another religion" that can assimilate to a society that values freedom of speech and belief.

Anonymous said...

Well one wona is not going to have her rights trampled by the Obama regime

I demand to be arrested for blasphemy. Now.

The Obama regime is going after the people who made the cheesy mohammed movie that the musloids are blaming the riots on. They are "suggesting" that YouTube "review" the content of the clip of the movie they have posted, and are also now looking to jail one of the filmmakers. In addition, the Obama propaganda arm operating as the L.A. Times has posted pictures and explicit location descriptions of the home of one of the filmmakers, clearly an effort to intimidate the filmmakers and to pass tactical intel to the muslim brotherhood - which is why you always publicize your personal info right off the bat like I did. In doing so you claim a massive tactical advantage and utterly deprive the enemy of his MAIN WEAPON, which is intimidation and fear.

Ladies and gentlemen, what you are witnessing is the establishment of the Sharia, specifically "islamic blasphemy" laws, right here in what used to be called the United States of America.

Well, I have a little something to say about all of this.

I have done what many consider to be the most hard-core, serious koran burning to date. I bookmarked the filthy damn thing with strips of raw bacon, and then I burned the satanic screed page by page after reading the demonic filth therein contained.

http://barnhardt.biz/index.cfm

DP111

Anonymous said...

DP111 wrote..

But but Rick, if we close down all western embassies and consulates, what is going to happen to millions of Muslims applying for visas to come and enlighten and enrich the Christian West.


Anonymous said...

Well, like DP111, 30% of pedophile Muslims will go to Maine - Vermont for arms and do the trade- off for guns and missiles for all their " hunger" .
With Edward Meese and Jeb Bush.